2021-08-25 16:09:31 +02:00
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
title: "What's all this talk about with or without breasts?"
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some people get confused by the terms _with breasts_ and _without breasts_.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We use these terms as a gender-inclusive way to ask whether or not a person has breasts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
##### As it applies to bodies
|
|
|
|
Nearly every clothing company has two main categories for their clothing: menswear and womenswear.
|
|
|
|
These garment designs are usually based off of the ideal or average body.
|
|
|
|
Meaning, for womenswear, the designer will likely make a garment for a body with breasts,
|
|
|
|
narrow shoulders, a smaller waist and wide hips.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These characteristics are generally thought of as _the typical characteristics of a woman's body_.
|
|
|
|
However, we believe it is best to stay away from this;
|
|
|
|
no body is average and we want to build a gender-inclusive environment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We do not want to exclude anyone and we think that _body shape ≠ gender_.
|
|
|
|
That's why we use the terminology **with breasts** and **without breasts**,
|
|
|
|
simply asking whether a person has breast tissue or not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
##### How it applies to patterns
|
|
|
|
Any user can draft any pattern on our site, as long as they provide the
|
|
|
|
required measurements. Which for some patterns includes measurements
|
|
|
|
that are only relevant if you have breasts.
|
|
|
|
|
2021-09-04 14:55:39 +02:00
|
|
|
##### How it applies to binding
|
|
|
|
If you are binding, use the **without breasts** patterns, and use the cirumference
|
|
|
|
of your binded chest as [chest measurement](/docs/measurements/chest/)
|
2021-08-25 16:09:31 +02:00
|
|
|
|