fix(docs): (cutonfold,grainline) Place outside complete
blocks
This commit is contained in:
parent
236d5cb1d6
commit
c8efb132e6
2 changed files with 25 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -63,6 +63,19 @@ macro('cutonfold', {
|
|||
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
|
||||
### Place outside `complete`
|
||||
|
||||
The `cutonfold` macro should be placed outside of `complete` blocks
|
||||
in the part's draft method.
|
||||
|
||||
This is because it provides information about the part's foldline and
|
||||
possible grainline,
|
||||
information that is always needed by the cutting layout regardless of
|
||||
whether `complete` details and graphics are shown on the pattern.
|
||||
|
||||
The `cutonfold` macro will automatically show or hide the cut on fold
|
||||
indicator based on the `complete` setting.
|
||||
|
||||
### It's safe to use a corner of your pattern part for this
|
||||
|
||||
Since this is typically used on corners, the generated cut-on-fold indicator
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -56,6 +56,18 @@ macro('grainline', {
|
|||
|
||||
## Notes
|
||||
|
||||
### Place outside `complete`
|
||||
|
||||
The `grainline` macro should be placed outside of `complete` blocks
|
||||
in the part's draft method.
|
||||
|
||||
This is because it provides information about the part's grainline,
|
||||
information that is always needed by the cutting layout regardless of
|
||||
whether `complete` details and graphics are shown on the pattern.
|
||||
|
||||
The `grainline` macro will automatically show or hide the grainline
|
||||
indicator based on the `complete` setting.
|
||||
|
||||
### Removing the grainline indicator
|
||||
|
||||
If you inherit a part with a grainline indicator and you'd like to remove it,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue